Monitoring & RUM market share in the Netherlands

Error tracking and real-user monitoring.

#	Technology	Global	Netherlands	United Kingdom	Italy	Spain	Japan	Latin America
1	New Relic	2.2%	1.5%	3.5%	1.1%	1.7%	0.7%	1.6%
2	Sentry	1.2%	1.3%	1%	0.6%	0.9%	0.4%	0.9%
3	Bugsnag	0.2%	0.3%	0.5%	0.1%	0.3%	<0.1%	0.2%
4	Datadog RUM	0.6%	0.3%	0.4%	0.3%	0.4%	0.2%	1.2%
5	Dynatrace	0.5%	0.3%	0.2%	0.7%	0.7%	<0.1%	0.6%
6	SpeedCurve LUX	0.2%	0.2%	0.3%	<0.1%	0.2%	<0.1%	<0.1%
7	Elastic APM RUM	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	0%	<0.1%	0%	<0.1%
8	AppDynamics	0.2%	<0.1%	0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%
9	Raygun	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	0%	0%	0%	<0.1%

By site popularity

Share of measured sites in each Tranco popularity band that use the technology: the top 1,000, 10,000 and 100,000 sites and the whole top million.

#	Technology	Top 10K	Top 100K	Top 1M
1	Sentry	6.1%	2.3%	1.3%
2	Datadog RUM	3%	1.2%	0.3%
3	New Relic	0%	4.1%	1.5%
4	Bugsnag	0%	0.4%	0.3%
5	Dynatrace	0%	0.7%	0.3%
6	SpeedCurve LUX	0%	1.4%	0.2%
7	Elastic APM RUM	0%	0.4%	<0.1%
8	AppDynamics	0%	0.2%	<0.1%
	Sites measured	33	567	8,580

Popular sites vs local business websites

Popular: sites of Netherlands from the Tranco top million. Local business: websites of companies with 1–20 locations in the country, taken from a business places directory (platforms, marketplaces and aggregators excluded).

#	Technology	Popular sites	Local business	Difference, pp
	Any Monitoring & RUM	3.9%	3.5%	−0.5
1	Sentry	1.3%	3.2%	+1.8
2	New Relic	1.5%	0.2%	−1.3
3	Datadog RUM	0.3%	<0.1%	−0.2
4	Bugsnag	0.3%	<0.1%	−0.3
5	Dynatrace	0.3%	<0.1%	−0.3
6	SpeedCurve LUX	0.2%	<0.1%	−0.1
7	Elastic APM RUM	<0.1%	<0.1%	−0.1
8	AppDynamics	<0.1%	<0.1%	−0.1
	Sites measured	8,580	22,067

Our crawler: 8,580 sites · Netherlands · updated 23 Oct 2026 · Methodology