CSS frameworks market share in the Netherlands

Utility and component CSS libraries.

#	Technology	Global	Netherlands	United Kingdom	Italy	Spain	Japan	Latin America
1	Bootstrap	24%	32%	35%	42%	43%	9.9%	37%
2	Tailwind CSS	11%	13%	9.9%	7.2%	6.6%	2.9%	8.8%
3	Foundation	0.5%	1%	1.1%	0.6%	0.5%	0.4%	0.4%
4	MUI	0.7%	0.5%	0.5%	0.6%	0.4%	0.2%	0.6%
5	UIkit	0.3%	0.4%	0.3%	0.8%	0.7%	0.3%	0.8%
6	Chakra UI	0.2%	0.3%	0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	0.2%
7	Bulma	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%	<0.1%

By site popularity

Share of measured sites in each Tranco popularity band that use the technology: the top 1,000, 10,000 and 100,000 sites and the whole top million.

#	Technology	Top 10K	Top 100K	Top 1M
1	Bootstrap	9.4%	18%	32%
2	Tailwind CSS	6.2%	16%	13%
3	Foundation	3.1%	0.9%	1%
4	MUI	0%	0.7%	0.5%
5	UIkit	0%	0.4%	0.4%
6	Chakra UI	0%	0.4%	0.3%
7	Bulma	0%	0%	<0.1%
	Sites measured	32	552	8,376

Popular sites vs local business websites

Popular: sites of Netherlands from the Tranco top million. Local business: websites of companies with 1–20 locations in the country, taken from a business places directory (platforms, marketplaces and aggregators excluded).

#	Technology	Popular sites	Local business	Difference, pp
	Any CSS frameworks	45%	30%	−15.2
1	Bootstrap	32%	23%	−8.5
2	Tailwind CSS	13%	4.8%	−8
3	Foundation	1%	1.4%	+0.3
4	UIkit	0.4%	1%	+0.6
5	MUI	0.5%	<0.1%	−0.4
6	Chakra UI	0.3%	<0.1%	−0.3
7	Bulma	<0.1%	<0.1%	0
	Sites measured	8,376	21,363

Our crawler: 8,376 sites · Netherlands · updated 13 Nov 2026 · Methodology